RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 12, 2015 at 2:16 pm
(February 12, 2015 at 2:22 am)robvalue Wrote: I would be interested to hear from one single person who was converted by hearing the Kalam argument, or any of these other stupid rationalizations. Or one person whose belief hinges on these arguments.
I think they are nothing but an attempt to make believers feel more secure with some sort of psuedo-logical argument to make their faith seem less ridiculous.
Exactly, these are ex post facto justifications for faith already practiced.
What's funny is that believers who shop this tripe don't understand that these efforts give evidence to the insecurity of their faith.
