RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 12, 2015 at 4:31 pm
(This post was last modified: February 12, 2015 at 4:35 pm by Simon Moon.)
(February 12, 2015 at 3:44 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: I don't think anyone is suggesting that there is more than one reality. The question concerns whether reality consists of only physical reality or whether other considerations are necessary to adequately explain all phenomena.
So far, the only thing that actually does seem to exist, is physical reality. There doesn't even seem to be any 'phenomena', other than physical phenomena, that needs to be explained.
Every time someone claims there is some sort of supernatural reality, they can't seem to support it with actual evidence and reasoned argument. All we ever seem to get is anecdotes, personal feelings, fallacious philosophical arguments and hearsay.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
