RE: Ken Ham petulantly stamps his feet at reality, internet replies, "this is stu...
February 12, 2015 at 6:07 pm
(February 12, 2015 at 5:57 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(February 12, 2015 at 5:54 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Regarding the national motto, despite it mentioning god, the Supreme Court has judged that the motto is more patriotic and historical in nature than anything else, and that it doesn't actively endorse a particular religion.
Not to mention it was installed (like the mention of God in the pledge of allegiance) in the mid-fifties in the fevered paranoid haze of the anti-communist hysteria of the time.
Oh, I know. I mentioned that in my first reply to YGNinja in this thread. The above is the SCOTUS' justification for allowing it to continue.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"