RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 12, 2015 at 9:09 pm
(February 12, 2015 at 7:12 pm)Faith No More Wrote:(February 12, 2015 at 5:07 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Coming from a guy that cannot tell Plato's theories from those of Aristotle, much less Aquinas.
That's a strong defense.
Yeah. I had a nice chuckle over that response too.
"You thought that argument you refuted came from Aristotle?! What a loser! It was Plato."
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.