Why a sequel? Ok, I'm sure all of those experiences have given the individual something of value since (the Christian) God is a personal God. It's usefulness should then only applied to the subjective nature of the experience, unless it's testimony for belief. Testimony is useful as indicative evidence if rationale and credible. If you're going to get into likelihoods, if the majority of the experiences are similar to the point they don't offer any new information, wouldn't it be more likely that culminating these experience would lead credence to the event? You can't of course prove that they're not entirely rationalizations, but I think they lend credence to something after life along with other evidence.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
