I got distracted for the last few days. Sorry about the delay.
With the mouth-breathing god-sucker already taken out of the equation (thanks, Parkers!), I'll continue what was being addressed to me before.
Whateverist pretty much had it right; there DOES need to be some general consensus on what exactly constitutes a god.
To trim the fat and put my foot down into a solid position, I should say that my stance that I am 100% sure that no god exists is in regards to the general consensus and the widely-accepted views of what constitutes a god, or gods. It's an ad-populum, but given that religion and the ideas of god/gods are given their society-wide validation through nothing other than via the populace, I feel fairly safe in making that appeal.
YG: I more or less don't care much else about what you have to say, because you're just incapable of grounding your mind in reality. But the one response I shall grace you with is quite simply this:
The burden of proof is on you and your ilk. You and your ilk have never brought forth any of it. It is not I who validates my atheism; it's you. Or, rather, your failures.
With the mouth-breathing god-sucker already taken out of the equation (thanks, Parkers!), I'll continue what was being addressed to me before.
Whateverist pretty much had it right; there DOES need to be some general consensus on what exactly constitutes a god.
To trim the fat and put my foot down into a solid position, I should say that my stance that I am 100% sure that no god exists is in regards to the general consensus and the widely-accepted views of what constitutes a god, or gods. It's an ad-populum, but given that religion and the ideas of god/gods are given their society-wide validation through nothing other than via the populace, I feel fairly safe in making that appeal.
YG: I more or less don't care much else about what you have to say, because you're just incapable of grounding your mind in reality. But the one response I shall grace you with is quite simply this:
The burden of proof is on you and your ilk. You and your ilk have never brought forth any of it. It is not I who validates my atheism; it's you. Or, rather, your failures.