Ken Ham petulantly stamps his feet at reality, internet replies, "this is stupid."

[Esquilax]

No, the ToT says the US Government wasn't founded on the Christian religion. The establishment clause, again, protects religion from interference from Government. Not the government or any of its institutions from religion, which we've already established couldn't possibly be the case because all US Colleges and Universities were founded as Christian, schoolchildren sung Christian hymns from the very beginning, and the entire nation learned to read and write using the Bible.

Okay genius, apparently I'm going to have to spell this out for you: if religion is protected from the government, but government is not protected from religion, what is to stop a religious group from influencing the government to in turn influence other religions by enshrining that religion into law, thus violating the very basis of the point you think the establishment clause was made to carry out?

Leaving aside your idiotic continued use of the argument from tradition fallacy, your inability to see the implications of what you're saying tell me you haven't really thought about any of this, beyond the usual entitled theist talking points.

Not surprisingly, the religious arguments aren't accurate.