RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 20, 2015 at 8:37 am
(February 20, 2015 at 4:18 am)emilynghiem Wrote: Hi Esquilax
Some people don't get how leaps are made into Global Warming
from the data either. They scratch their heads and say HOW did you get from here to THAT???
Kinda ironic that one side tries to prove God and the other Global Warming, they irritate the heck out of each other, and yet complain when the other side pushes arguments that make no sense either when they do the same thing when it's their turn.
Know what the difference is?
Evidence.
(February 20, 2015 at 4:18 am)emilynghiem Wrote: Can't people agree to be OK with natural laws we DO AGREE ON.
If we agree on the natural laws, then clearly people agree to be OK on them. What you can't do is posit "God" as a natural law and expect to be taken seriously by default. You need to put in the work for that.
(February 20, 2015 at 4:18 am)emilynghiem Wrote: and quit adding God or global warming, if cause and effect are ENOUGH to agree to stop pollution and waste, restore the environment and seek sustainable solutions to social problems. Why add another condition to PROVE if we already know these are messes that need to be cleaned up?
Congratulations, you just discovered Occam's Razor. Mind you don't cut yourself.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
