RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 22, 2015 at 2:39 am
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2015 at 2:50 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(February 22, 2015 at 12:35 am)YGninja Wrote:(February 20, 2015 at 12:08 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: That's because some people don't understand science, and others don't understand bullshit.
I'm happy to debate anyone here on evolution. The evolution which purports to explain the emergence of complex life from the most simple single celled organisms, not the "change over time", bunk.
That's a distinction without a difference, kiddo.
Perhaps you should study up first, before you get your ass handed back to you.
(February 22, 2015 at 12:52 am)YGninja Wrote: For evolution to happen things must change over time, but change over time alone is not evolution, which is the process theorised to explain the arrival of complex life from the most simple.
Of course "change over time" is not the sole premise of evolution.
Your first study assignment, therefore, will be to read up on the concept of "natural selection".
(February 22, 2015 at 1:14 am)YGninja Wrote: I don't believe there is such a mechanism which could turn a single cell into a human being over the course of billions of years. Certainly not natural selection acting on mutation.
Facts contradict your beliefs. Feel free to argue them.
(February 22, 2015 at 1:26 am)YGninja Wrote: Whats more, you need a mechanism to increase the quantity of data. Mutation only changes existing data.
This is factually incorrect. Mutations can also cause genetic information to be repeated, or doubled. And then mutation can act upon that extra length of information to change it.
You're welcome.
Now, get back to studying natural selection. You will need to understand it in order to continue this lesson.
