Gaps in theistic arguments. Secular theism vs religious theism

[Pizza]

Not really. Fifth way just shows a God that designed the universe for some goal. You would have to argue that the sources for the Bible are highly likely to be reliable, which is a fool's errand. You can't just assume the bible as highly reliable merely because they are all we got on the subject of Jesus. Ancient anecdotal evidence is weak. But even if for argument's sake a secular theist assumes Christ was resurrected by God it can't just be assume the Christian God did it since another God, or Goddess for that matter, could have done it, perhaps for a joke. If we compare secular theism to religious theism occam's razor would narrow it down to secular theism. Why? Because religious theism is a large complex of many claims that all require proof and/or evidence while secular theism is based on fewer claims and requires less argument to defend. A secular theist could not have to interpret and defend religious doctrine while the religious do.