(August 22, 2010 at 3:06 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: lolYou're a diest in disguiseMine is the mainstream God of Christianity Captain. I follow that doctrine precisely. ie I don't waiver from it at all. I'm surprised that you don't recognise the subject of your questioning, after all, we seem to be addressing basic and standard attributes of the Christian God, although I know we could be more accurate in our definitions and usages of terms in that context.
Considering transcendence has to remain the subject of logic, which is sufficient for us to deduce and conclude as we have been doing. Your points were reasonably made on those grounds.
. So what arguments most represnt your concept of god. You are not a cosmological or design man, by inference I would hazard that ontological arguments float your boat. Are you a Kantian, is the moral argument the one that convinces you?On the subject of this thread, your refutation pre-supposes that god would choose to create a universe containing life in such a chaotic manner. It is in his power not to do that and make it look designed. Why make it look like he didnt, or is he secretly seeking divine hiddenness?:
1 God is an all omni being seeking to create an animate universe
2 Gods first step is to create a chaos whose natural tendancy is towards a lifeless universe
Of course looking for a simpler explanation he might not really exist
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.
