Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2025, 6:31 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fine Tuning Argument
#13
RE: Fine Tuning Argument
(August 22, 2010 at 7:42 pm)LastPoet Wrote: You keep inventing probabilities nogodaloud, and keep running away from peoples arguments. On this thread you claim:

NoGodaloud ? Wrote:Lee Smolin (a world-class physicist and a leader in quantum gravity) estimates that if the physical constants of the universe were chosen randomly, the epistemic-probability of ending up with a world with carbon chemistry is less than one part in 10^220.

Yet, on the "How to debate a Christian" thread you claim:

NoGodaloud ? Wrote:But to have just one life permitting universe, you need 1 to 10^500 attempts to get it done. Thats a 1 with 500 zeros.

I rest my case. You sir, are full of bullshit.

Lee Smolin was referring only the estimate to produce Carbon based life by chance.
The other estimate includes not only the chance of carbon based life, but the universe as a whole.

You rest your case, because you have no convincing case. Sadly you don't admit it, instead of this, you insult me......

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Fine Tuning Argument - by The_Flying_Skeptic - August 20, 2010 at 8:53 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by LastPoet - August 20, 2010 at 9:06 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Minimalist - August 20, 2010 at 9:33 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by NoGodaloud ? - August 21, 2010 at 12:03 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by The_Flying_Skeptic - August 22, 2010 at 3:23 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Welsh cake - August 21, 2010 at 6:28 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Eilonnwy - August 21, 2010 at 7:09 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by tackattack - August 21, 2010 at 7:59 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Eilonnwy - August 21, 2010 at 8:05 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Captain Scarlet - August 22, 2010 at 2:35 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by NoGodaloud ? - August 22, 2010 at 4:26 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by LastPoet - August 22, 2010 at 7:42 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by NoGodaloud ? - August 22, 2010 at 9:11 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by LastPoet - August 22, 2010 at 9:17 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Captain Scarlet - September 2, 2010 at 5:52 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 19436 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Paraselene
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 9160 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  The not-so-fine tuning argument. Jehanne 38 11309 March 10, 2016 at 9:11 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Fine tuning of the multiverse? tor 8 2466 March 27, 2014 at 3:29 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Fine tuning argument assessed max-greece 99 34037 March 10, 2014 at 10:35 pm
Last Post: Rampant.A.I.
  The fine tuning argument solja247 68 27334 September 27, 2010 at 2:29 pm
Last Post: TheDarkestOfAngels



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)