Fine Tuning Argument

[NoGodaloud ?]

You keep inventing probabilities nogodaloud, and keep running away from peoples arguments. On this thread you claim:

Lee Smolin (a world-class physicist and a leader in quantum gravity) estimates that if the physical constants of the universe were chosen randomly, the epistemic-probability of ending up with a world with carbon chemistry is less than one part in 10^220.

Yet, on the "How to debate a Christian" thread you claim:

But to have just one life permitting universe, you need 1 to 10^500 attempts to get it done. Thats a 1 with 500 zeros.

I rest my case. You sir, are full of bullshit.

Lee Smolin was referring only the estimate to produce Carbon based life by chance.
The other estimate includes not only the chance of carbon based life, but the universe as a whole.

You rest your case, because you have no convincing case. Sadly you don't admit it, instead of this, you insult me......