(March 2, 2015 at 2:57 pm)YGninja Wrote:(March 2, 2015 at 2:53 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Where are you trying to go, with this question?
Well i am trying to get you to recognise that we don't even know how much we know, of all there is to know. So the fact that we may have a veneer of naturalistic explanation for some of the things we do know, really is no grounds to assume a general principle that everything which exists is natural.
Yeah, I suspected you were trying to find the threshold of knowledge, so you could cram your god into the gaps beyond it. You never fail to disappoint.
Quote: Thats just not true at all. The reality is "Every explanation which we have explained naturally, has been explained naturally", which doesn't really get you anywhere.
Do you intend to tell us these things that we have an explanation for, where the explanation wasn't natural?

"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!