Enlightened [Elitist] Agnosticism

[One Above All]

The thing is, if someone wants to have just "agnostic" as a position, that is fine. They are using different definitions of words to the standard, that is all. And by their definitions, I'm just agnostic too. It's pointless argueing about whose definitions are better, you just need to pick one or the other so you're on the same page.

It's like a "just an agnostic" is standing on exactly the same floor of the belief building as me, but instead of calling it floor 4 they want to call it floor Special K. That's fine. But we're still on the same floor.

Now try to get it through their thick skulls. I dare you. I've explained time and time again to self-proclaimed agnostics that "agnostic" is meaningless as an answer to the question of whether or not they believe. They keep calling themselves agnostics - which is "fine", I don't expect intellectual honesty from them - and still don't/won't answer the question.