(March 7, 2015 at 8:15 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: I use proper definitions of things. If that means "getting caught up in semantics", I'm guilty.
Now, care to explain why "God" gets special pleading, when you can't demonstrate his existence to anyone who doesn't presuppose him?
Care to explain why God shouldn't get your "special pleading?" If there were ever an instance for a case of special pleading, should it not be in this particular case?
I don't presuppose God - I came to the conclusion of His existence long ago through logic, years before I knew Him or followed His ways. Why is presupposition necessary? Look at the world and deduce, rationalize. Science explains some things, but none of it disproves God in the slightest. In fact, science and mathematics do nothing but point to intelligent design of some sort.
Go ahead and cite evolution. Not that I believe in it, but who is to say that isn't how God created us? Why can't He use evolution if He chooses? Why can't He use the Big Bang to create the universe? He certainly could. Again, nothing to disprove God.


