RE: Religious belief/disbelief pill
March 13, 2015 at 11:31 am
(This post was last modified: March 13, 2015 at 11:33 am by Norman Humann.)
(March 13, 2015 at 11:25 am)watchamadoodle Wrote: O.k. what do you think about merely trying to persuade a person to believe the way you want them to believe?
Nothing wrong with trying to persuade someone.
(March 13, 2015 at 11:25 am)watchamadoodle Wrote: How is debating any different than forcing a pill down their throats?
It's presenting arguments, not forcefully making someone take the same stance as you.
(March 13, 2015 at 11:25 am)watchamadoodle Wrote: Should I try to lead them to the promised land of truth as I see it (i.e. atheism)?
If they are willing to discuss their religious beliefs with you, there's nothing wrong I see in presenting your views and trying to convince them you're right. Ultimately it's their personal choice to believe whatever they fancy. If you don't agree with them, you can show them the issues you have with their beliefs. If you think their beliefs are causing them harm or distress, it would be the right thing to do. But if not, it's not exactly any of your problem what they pray to.
(March 13, 2015 at 11:25 am)watchamadoodle Wrote: Should I let them believe nonsense if it seems to benefit them and benefit society?
The wording is unfortunate. Particularly the word "let". It's not exactly your choice to decide what they will believe.
Organised religion does visible harm to society, that's why I think it should be moderated at least. I do wish it would disappear completely, but that's wishful thinking. Personal beliefs don't do much harm if they are kept to the believer and not forced on anyone else.
