Sins

[Drich]

Drich, I want to make certain that I understand you correctly. If an unmarried person thinks about having sex with anyone then they have committed a sin?

That would be the sin of lust.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lust

Do you believe some people are born gay?

we for the most part are born sexual creatures, how we decide to express or enact our sexual desires is just that, a desire which again points to choice.

In the story about the trucker, you stated that you decided at that moment you weren't gay. Didn't you know before which sex you found attractive? How old were you?

That was my final exam. I was tested, and aced the herto exam.

I was probably very early 20's

---

[quote='Drich' pid='902158' dateline='1426793730']
Making tough and undesirable choice and living with the consenquences whether you like them or not.

So basically you're saying, being gay is a tough and undesirable choice, but gays are tough enough to walk that extra mile.

so you're basicly saying being gay is indeed a choice? Because as you pointed out if a gay man chooses 'an undesirable choice of being gay' then one can underscore he did infact choose to be gay.
welcome to the dark side, see it's not so bad. I just hope for you that you don't have a clothing line and Elton John does not hear of this.

So let me be perfectly blunt: Would you get it up with another man? I mean, it's a choice after all. You could just as well walk that path and blow some dick. That's what you're saying.

i guess that would depend on whether or not I go to prision. I hear everyone 'chooses to be gay for the stay' (whether they want to or not.)

No, that's actually not what you're saying. You're dodging the issue as usual when people try to nail you to your baseless assertions. You're just a bundle of walking bible quotes and hot air when push comes to shove. Own up for once and tell us, how the choice of being gay would pan out for you as an individual and male. At least I assume you're male.

so you think my trucker story was a bible quote? We it wasn't. I was given an oppertunity to be gay, and I declined it. Again it was a choice. What about my answer confuses you so? The fact that I am not confused about my sexual orientation in any way shape or form?

Even if I could never have sex with my wife again, I would choose a-sexuality over homosexuality. The key word here again is choose. There is always a choice, what most of you don't consider is the third option of a sexuality. It's always one or the other (homo/herto) with you people. Which is why your arguement fails. You want to believe because homosexuality is not an option for me that I have no other options which takes choice off the table.. Again, that's a bit of a 'queer' thought seeing how there is and alway be the third choice Christ Himself mentions. That is to be a eunic/a-sexual...

For me that would be the tougher choice than to follow my sinful nature.

What else you got?