Wookie, I get what you're saying. It was my impression that they had a sort of ideological litmus test. Am I mistaken in thinking that they require members to adhere to a specific set of value claims?
Throwing people out for being disruptive is understandable. Throwing them out -- or worse, accusing them of racism or sexism etc -- will almost certainly foster groupthink.
If that's what they want, it's all good. Such an approach is nothing I'm interested in supporting.
Throwing people out for being disruptive is understandable. Throwing them out -- or worse, accusing them of racism or sexism etc -- will almost certainly foster groupthink.
If that's what they want, it's all good. Such an approach is nothing I'm interested in supporting.
