To those who believe Bible is not literal...

[annatar]

Check my first post in this topic. I already answered you.

Yes there was a miscommunication indeed. And partly becouse I am little bit sleepy..
For you to understand what happened I will quote the full convo..

"Second, Why god sent something that much vague to people? Didn't he knew that people "might" misunderstood him for 2000 years (and counting for some)?"

I asked in first post

What would you have prefered He send? of course He knew it could be misinterpreted, but that is because it was something He created through man, and man is falliable. God did not 'send' the Bible, He had men who understood Him better than most create it for Him.

you answered.

First of all he could really send it.Or he could speak to the whole world (he is all powerful after all)
and if those man were the ones who understood him better than most Why they didn't just wrote the main points instead of making stories that could be anything and mostly bad things! You guys are working really hard to change that stories into something good. And it makes them more ridiculous than its literal meaning..
Just listen to yourseves guys Does your arguments really makes any sense to you!!!???

I replied..

God is indeed all-powerful and could, in fact, speak to the whole world. The question is, in what way would He choose to speak, and why? Perhaps He has already spoken, not only in metaphysical ways but even in plain English--Oh hey! There's this book that was written about God a long time ago! It's called the Bible!

you said..

BRavo!!! Congratz!!! becouse we are going back to the begining of our argument WHY didn't he sent bible as literal?

we came where we started as you see.. Would you like to answer this with something different