(March 28, 2015 at 6:23 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:(March 28, 2015 at 6:14 pm)Nestor Wrote: Here's an "actual copy of my delusion":
You'll have to go to the Vatican Library of Rome to have any chance of seeing it personally, so you'd better start buffing up your credentials, especially your knowledge of history.
Anyway, you can read it here, if you read Greek: https://archive.org/details/OldTestament...xVaticanus
Oh, and once you get through researching the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus, there's a third and fourth manuscript(s) that contain the majority of the Greek Old and New Testaments, both dated from the fifth century: Codex Alexandrinus
Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus
What are you going to propose next, an Omphalos hypothesis for biblical manuscripts?
Well, that's obviously BS because the ancient writers didn't put their writing into numbered verses. It's a fraud.

Well, I didn't think you were worth my time, and while that much is confirmed now, I can at least bow out from this discussion proud of having made a clear demonstration of the fact that calling one's self an "atheist" or a "skeptic" doesn't make one more pervious to reason.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza