(March 25, 2015 at 12:15 am)snowtracks Wrote:and the rest of you low-lifer's need to get on you knees and figure it out.(March 23, 2015 at 5:03 am)Losty Wrote: Why did you quote that when you didn't respond to it?taking an indirect approach. If the two sources of knowledge - empiricism, rationalism - (http://www.theoryofknowledge.info/sources-of-knowledge/) were correctly applied, the answer to the question ‘Does the Universe exist for a purpose?’ would be inconclusive; empiricism or rationalism wouldn’t provide a definite answer one way or the other; hence the reason why revelation is needed. I incorrectly assumed that the board atheists would say the question is unanswerable and wouldn’t post an answer of ’no purpose’. Kudos to any atheist that didn't endorse.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
