|
So you when to hell now what.
|
 (March 22, 2015 at 11:50 pm)snowtracks Wrote:(March 16, 2015 at 10:55 pm)Surgenator Wrote: Revelation is not a source of knowledge. At best it is hearsay, at worst a delusion. In either case, it is not knowledge.There isn’t one atheist on this board that will unequivocally state that the universe exist for no purpose. You have been proven wrong.  (March 23, 2015 at 5:03 am)Losty Wrote:taking an indirect approach. If the two sources of knowledge - empiricism, rationalism - (http://www.theoryofknowledge.info/sources-of-knowledge/) were correctly applied, the answer to the question ‘Does the Universe exist for a purpose?’ would be inconclusive; empiricism or rationalism wouldn’t provide a definite answer one way or the other; hence the reason why revelation is needed. I incorrectly assumed that the board atheists would say the question is unanswerable and wouldn’t post an answer of ’no purpose’. Kudos to any atheist that didn't endorse.(March 22, 2015 at 11:50 pm)snowtracks Wrote: There isn’t one atheist on this board that will unequivocally state that the universe exist for no purpose. They may attempt to qualify it with an adjunct like that it has meaning for them, or they make their lives meaningfully. If by some quirky chance one ever did flat out state that, they wouldn’t get any kudos as a stamp-of-approval. There is a reason that won’t be done.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
 RE: So you when to hell now what.
March 25, 2015 at 12:42 am
(This post was last modified: March 25, 2015 at 12:56 am by IATIA.)
(November 21, 2014 at 2:58 am)Godschild Wrote:They will once PT opens his cafe and I will definitely check it out.(November 21, 2014 at 2:21 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: What would I do in Hell?No one eats in hell nor do they drink. (March 22, 2015 at 11:50 pm)snowtracks Wrote: There isn’t one atheist on this board that will unequivocally state that the universe exist for no purpose.There is no god! There is no purpose to life. There is no purpose to the universe. Absolutely none. Nada. (March 25, 2015 at 12:15 am)snowtracks Wrote: taking an indirect approach. If the two sources of knowledge - empiricism, rationalism - (http://www.theoryofknowledge.info/sources-of-knowledge/) were correctly applied, the answer to the question ‘Does the Universe exist for a purpose?’ would be inconclusive; empiricism or rationalism wouldn’t provide a definite answer one way or the other; hence the reason why revelation is needed.Purpose requires intent. There must then be an intender and there is none, ergo, no purpose.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion. -- Superintendent Chalmers Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things. -- Ned Flanders Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral. -- The Rev Lovejoy 
I don't want to sound like a dick but...
If you believe for one moment you think the meaning of life is to kiss gods ask and ask for forgiveness for to get into heaven..... That is just...fucking sad.....
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe> (March 23, 2015 at 5:03 am)Losty Wrote: Why did you quote that when you didn't respond to it? The same reason he quoted you quoting that and not responding to it. He's a dick.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
 (March 23, 2015 at 11:05 am)Esquilax Wrote:You used "?" when you meant to use "!", right?(March 23, 2015 at 5:03 am)Losty Wrote: Why did you quote that when you didn't respond to it?Because he's dumb?
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould (March 25, 2015 at 1:29 am)dyresand Wrote: I don't want to sound like a dick but... Damn spell check. But here is the Fix
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
I've played enough DooM to know what to do when I go to hell.
(March 26, 2015 at 11:13 pm)DemonicLemon Wrote: I've played enough DooM to know what to do when I go to hell. Shotgun time.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>(March 25, 2015 at 12:15 am)snowtracks Wrote:and the rest of you low-lifer's need to get on you knees and figure it out.(March 23, 2015 at 5:03 am)Losty Wrote: Why did you quote that when you didn't respond to it?taking an indirect approach. If the two sources of knowledge - empiricism, rationalism - (http://www.theoryofknowledge.info/sources-of-knowledge/) were correctly applied, the answer to the question ‘Does the Universe exist for a purpose?’ would be inconclusive; empiricism or rationalism wouldn’t provide a definite answer one way or the other; hence the reason why revelation is needed. I incorrectly assumed that the board atheists would say the question is unanswerable and wouldn’t post an answer of ’no purpose’. Kudos to any atheist that didn't endorse.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
