(March 31, 2015 at 6:21 pm)Cephus Wrote:(March 31, 2015 at 5:43 pm)Nestor Wrote: It's not even a matter of believers versus non, as most non-believers acquainted with the data find many supporting evidences for Jesus' historical existence. You can dismiss them but then you do have the burden of citing why, or you risk being ignored altogether.
Because you haven't actually presented any objective evidence yet. All you've presented are unsupported claims. Just because lots of people believe these unsupported claims doesn't stop them from being unsupported claims and thus unimpressive to skeptics. Try harder.
Honestly, I didn't see you come up with an alternate explanation for the points he made. You just arguing that it's all "unsupported claims". Do you understand how critical textual analysis works?