RE: Objective evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ?
March 31, 2015 at 10:35 pm
(This post was last modified: March 31, 2015 at 10:35 pm by Mudhammam.)
(March 31, 2015 at 9:51 pm)Cephus Wrote: You are simply declaring them experts, but intellectual expertise is not gained by having some letters after your name, but because you actually follow credible methods and acknowledge the evidence that actually exists. Scientists don't make science. It's science that makes scientists. Scientists are only scientists so long as they are doing science.
Oh the irony. No, I'm not "simply declaring them experts." I'm saying there is a credible method and evidence that actually exists, and you're failing to follow it by alleging some form of conspiracy that literally only about six people out of thousands who have devoted hundreds of hours applying their methods and scouring the evidence take seriously. I wouldn't be if surprised Intelligent Design is more represented in the scientific community. Make of that what you will, it doesn't really bother me. It gives me pause though it's not entirely surprising given that, as a non-expert, the mythicist theories I've looked at seem incredibly far-fetched and unsupported.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza