RE: Objective evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ?
April 1, 2015 at 12:04 am
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2015 at 12:07 am by DeistPaladin.)
But that information which convinces the experts is available on request. That's the point.
When defending evolution, biologists don't say "shut up, we're the experts and we say so". They bring evidence to the table to show why they are convinced.
Oh, the Bible tells us so. Well, then...
*Facepalm*
Where do I even begin? I'm sorry, it's been a long day and my brain is fried. I'll try to list all the problems with this line of thinking when I can.
When defending evolution, biologists don't say "shut up, we're the experts and we say so". They bring evidence to the table to show why they are convinced.
Oh, the Bible tells us so. Well, then...
*Facepalm*
Where do I even begin? I'm sorry, it's been a long day and my brain is fried. I'll try to list all the problems with this line of thinking when I can.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
