Sounds like a winning business plan. LOL
Perhaps in taking this 'principled stand', the proprietors of the establishment failed to account for a few simple factoids. One being, of course, that any LGBT folks who are aware of their position (and by now, that's like all of them) aren't going to be frequenting their establishment. Perhaps they're willing to let that revenue go. But what of all the people who aren't LGBT who find such a policy so distasteful that they *also* will be voting with their wallets?
That's going to be a much larger demographic.
These people are fools, and if their business goes under, they deserved it.
Perhaps in taking this 'principled stand', the proprietors of the establishment failed to account for a few simple factoids. One being, of course, that any LGBT folks who are aware of their position (and by now, that's like all of them) aren't going to be frequenting their establishment. Perhaps they're willing to let that revenue go. But what of all the people who aren't LGBT who find such a policy so distasteful that they *also* will be voting with their wallets?
That's going to be a much larger demographic.
These people are fools, and if their business goes under, they deserved it.
