General argument for Islam.

[Mystic]

I don't think you got the point at all. 

First of all, it's not a matter of caring. It's a matter of scale. The universe is 13.5 billion years old. We existed for maybe 100K of that. The universe includes hundreds of billions of galaxies. We occupy a microscopic spec of one. 

So we should be occupying a bunch of galaxies to be significant?

I don't understand the point of this.

It's not all about us. 

I don't believe it is all about us. I believe God creates infinite universes, and in these universes, there is sentient life in different galaxies. I believe God creates infinite souls.

Second, why is your god so insecure that he even wants, never mind needs, our worship and love? The Islamo-Christian view of God is a deeply insecure but powerful being that can create a universe but needs validation from comparitively microscopic beings. It's kind of touching in a strange way but not believable. I can understand why a religion would create a god like this but not why God would actually be like this. 

That's a straw man. God doesn't gain or lose anything from our worship and love, but we gain something, and if we neglect it, we are in a state of corruption. God created us with a link to him, and if we neglect that link, we are doing injustice and being ungrateful to a huge favor. He sends Prophets to remind people and re-establish the link.

Third, there's no reason to believe in this personal god. Stories of miracles are either not proven to be true or proven not to be true. We live in a natural universe governed by predictable laws and best understood by science and reason. Theists come up with all manner of excuses for this. Catholics say it's "free will". Some Protestants say "mysterious ways". Muslims often say "it's a test". Occam's Razor says it's exactly what it looks like: the reason there doesn't seem to be a personal god is because there is not a personal god. 

I think the laws of the universe as constantly imposed by God. I don't think anything by it's nature just has laws innate in it. These laws God has put upon everything and is constantly establishing them. Without God, there would be no laws. 

It's God that keeps the bird in the air and the whole universe in place, by constantly maintaining the universe in the way he does. Given that is the case, he can always break laws and cause miracles.

Fourth, if God WERE to create a religion, there would be one (1) religion, one (1) holy book and that holy book, authored by the Creator, would contain knowledge, wisdom and morality that would astound people even today.

How do you know this about God and people? How do you know God would make sure only to have one holy book in the world forcing all people not to have their own holy books and how do you know if he written a holy book with exalted wisdom and a nature beyond human capability, that all would acknowledge it?

This holy book would have been published all over the world, even before these cultures had any contact with each other. Instead, we see different religions with different holy books as they arise from different cultures and the only way they spread is by human efforts. 

So would he force all people to keep to the holy book, and follow it? What if they distort it, God would force the people not to do that? Why do you say this?

The "morality" of these religions focus on the "evils" of victimless crimes such as blasphemy, apostasy and idolatry while exhalting useless "virtues" such as rituals and adherence to dietary taboos. Since human morality has progressed since the authoring of these books, the values often seem barbaric and backward to modern sensibilities. 

Most humans don't see these things as barbaric and backward. It's a minority that does. 

Fifth, the absence of a true religion does not create a meaningless or amoral existence. We are community animals and we have a sense of empathy and conscience for one another. We form civilizations and make laws that help to alleviate conflict and suffering. We don't always get it right but we're getting better. Barbaric practices that used to be commonplace, such as slavery or wars of aggression, once sacred, then defended, then debated, are now condemned by civilized society and we're seeking to eliminate them. We are not just evolving biologically but also morally and intellectually. 

Advancement in some areas doesn't mean we advancing in all areas. Another thing is this is only this century. What about in the past. Did people not need guidance in the past when there is bunch of superstition and false religions?

Building upon the foundation that we are given, seeking in our own small way to make the universe a little better than when we found it, is purpose enough. 

I disagree. The relationship with God and linking to him, is much higher then just making the world a little bit better.   But this takes a lover to understand. When you are in love, that beloved is so central to you. The problem again Deism is not in love with the Divine. It doesn't understand intimacy with God and neither does it understand the close friends of God relationship to other humans.