RE: To those who believe Bible is not literal...
September 1, 2010 at 5:50 pm
(This post was last modified: September 1, 2010 at 6:01 pm by annatar.)
okay lets talk about facts: - I see no facts anna
No you don't want to see. It's different.
-Christians killed, tortured and burnt people becouse they think bible was literal. - no people who were Christians do non Christian things sometimes
You know your arguments are pretty lame right?
People did 'non Christian' things becouse they thought it was what god commands them to do.
Let me ask you this then, What conclusion you would draw if you had accepted bible's words literally?
-God Sent or inspired people to write bible illiteral. - The bible is a book on the subject of religion and not science
I never said it was science. But not just scientific books are literal or obvious..
-God could simply talk to the whole world. He doesn't even need to "inspire" someone so it wasn't the only way to communicate. - he couldn't, as that would be illogical
Why do you think it would be illogical? We are not playing a game if you think there are rules. And you believe he is omnipotent right? He can do whatever he want.( And he Chose this one???!)
-If you send something that much important, and want people to obey your words it would be a wise thing to send it more clear. - but you can't because it would be illogical
Its perfectly logical to me.
lets say I am a boss,
I want my employes to produce pen. But I am telling only to one of my employe: "make me something mightier than sword ". So they are producing Shotguns. Is it my fault or theirs???
My conclusion: God is a sick bastard who caused thousands of people die just to send something poetic. - with absolutely zero reason
Reason is something you are not familiar I believe...
Your conclusion: You are illogical. - You are not illogical, some of your points are.
After this discussion Im not even sure that you know what logic is..
"Your logic seemingly enables you to conclude stuff without proof."
You don't need a proof to refute something that is produced without proof. - You don't need it because it's impossible. That's why you can't logically conclude anything.
its not impossible It's simple. Here, the simple and logical conclusion of this thread: Bible is not literal = Bullshit.
No you don't want to see. It's different.
-Christians killed, tortured and burnt people becouse they think bible was literal. - no people who were Christians do non Christian things sometimes
You know your arguments are pretty lame right?
People did 'non Christian' things becouse they thought it was what god commands them to do.
Let me ask you this then, What conclusion you would draw if you had accepted bible's words literally?
-God Sent or inspired people to write bible illiteral. - The bible is a book on the subject of religion and not science
I never said it was science. But not just scientific books are literal or obvious..
-God could simply talk to the whole world. He doesn't even need to "inspire" someone so it wasn't the only way to communicate. - he couldn't, as that would be illogical
Why do you think it would be illogical? We are not playing a game if you think there are rules. And you believe he is omnipotent right? He can do whatever he want.( And he Chose this one???!)
-If you send something that much important, and want people to obey your words it would be a wise thing to send it more clear. - but you can't because it would be illogical
Its perfectly logical to me.
lets say I am a boss,
I want my employes to produce pen. But I am telling only to one of my employe: "make me something mightier than sword ". So they are producing Shotguns. Is it my fault or theirs???
My conclusion: God is a sick bastard who caused thousands of people die just to send something poetic. - with absolutely zero reason
Reason is something you are not familiar I believe...
Your conclusion: You are illogical. - You are not illogical, some of your points are.
After this discussion Im not even sure that you know what logic is..
"Your logic seemingly enables you to conclude stuff without proof."
You don't need a proof to refute something that is produced without proof. - You don't need it because it's impossible. That's why you can't logically conclude anything.
its not impossible It's simple. Here, the simple and logical conclusion of this thread: Bible is not literal = Bullshit.
Quote:Many that live deserve death. Some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them, Frodo? Do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment. Even the very wise cannot see all ends.
Gandalf The Gray.