Sorry to throw a monkey wrench into the game, but it is possible to be a gnostic atheist with regard to some gods, but a agnostic theist with regard to other gods, or the idea of a god in general.
For example, I am a gnostic atheist with regard to Zeus and Thor because thunder has been adequately explained without the use of a thunder god. Similarly, I am sure there isn't a sun god like Ra or Apollo, just a sun which we can see. I'm also gnostic on the subject of whether the god described by the Old Testament exists as described by the Old Testament. That god conflicts with what we know about the way the earth and life were created and therefore does not exist as described. You could say I'm a gnostic non-believer in Biblical inerrantcy.
But I'm an agnostic atheist about the possibility of a god more generally. Thus whether I'm gnostic or agnostic depends largely on how you define god.
For example, I am a gnostic atheist with regard to Zeus and Thor because thunder has been adequately explained without the use of a thunder god. Similarly, I am sure there isn't a sun god like Ra or Apollo, just a sun which we can see. I'm also gnostic on the subject of whether the god described by the Old Testament exists as described by the Old Testament. That god conflicts with what we know about the way the earth and life were created and therefore does not exist as described. You could say I'm a gnostic non-believer in Biblical inerrantcy.
But I'm an agnostic atheist about the possibility of a god more generally. Thus whether I'm gnostic or agnostic depends largely on how you define god.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.