(April 5, 2015 at 3:18 pm)comet Wrote: I don't do "grammar proves my point" so that can be flushed with your toilet paper.
I don't do strawmen, so up yours. I said it would help; not that it would be the defining factor. Readability is important if you're communicating through the use of a written medium. Otherwise we might as well "r1t3 lyk d15" and fuck everyone who doesn't understand it.
(April 5, 2015 at 3:18 pm)comet Wrote: Militant is an emotional connection to anti religion and you reject what you reject because you rejected it. I get that part too. I agree with that part and your first post.
So you're saying you've not reading my posts, seeing as how I've not written the word "militant" in any of them (it's not a word I use often; I'm willing to bet it's in no more than 50 posts I've ever made on any website ever). Gotcha.
(April 5, 2015 at 3:18 pm)comet Wrote: "Gnostic" That is a false claim.
Yours is, I agree. Mine is not, however.
(April 5, 2015 at 3:18 pm)comet Wrote: Other than you being in the know I agree with you. But who is in the know anyway.
Gnostic atheists are "in the know". Agnostic atheists are not. It's right there in the description.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
![[Image: LB_Header_Idea_A.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i280.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fkk172%2FBlaziken_rjcf%2FLB_Header_Idea_A.jpg)