RE: Atheist or Agnostic?
April 5, 2015 at 8:42 pm
(This post was last modified: April 5, 2015 at 8:46 pm by comet.)
(April 5, 2015 at 6:21 pm)One Above All Wrote:(April 5, 2015 at 5:27 pm)comet Wrote: It all starts with honesty. That is my main point. you are what you think you are.
I thought one only knew what one is when one fully understood every word ever spoken by four people you picked at random. Changing your story, or just failing to communicate because you're spitting out incoherent sentences?
(April 5, 2015 at 5:27 pm)comet Wrote: "Gnostic atheist" is a bullsit term.
It's a term used to define those who claim knowledge of the lack of existence of deities. Does that confuse you in some way?
(April 5, 2015 at 5:27 pm)comet Wrote: I don't do beliefs based on emotional connections.
Your words say otherwise. Also your species.
(April 5, 2015 at 5:27 pm)comet Wrote: I certainly don't mess around with skewed world views.
Of course you don't! Because you're special!
(April 5, 2015 at 5:27 pm)comet Wrote: You will not change.
Tell me more! What does your supernatural ability to see into the hearts and minds of others tell you?
(April 5, 2015 at 5:27 pm)comet Wrote: end of story.
I was just starting to like the story.
(April 5, 2015 at 5:27 pm)comet Wrote: If'en ya fact fight, I am in. If-en ya wanna keep on self justifying a personal opinion as more than a personal opinion, I am out. Buh bye.
I'm not sure this is English
don't matter the grammar.
just for the record, I agreed with dude and still youz dog piled on. There must be disconnect in the brains or some deep emotional connections to a particular world view that is independent of facts. I call them militant or fundies. A very limited mind set in them two classes. maybe they solely base their world view on philosophy? Deep emotional responses and philosophy can screw a world view. I wouldn't mix them two. just bad mo jo there.
not sure why you brought up the supernatural. for me There is no supernatural. But just read your post and get a glimpse into the heart and mind. It aint rocket science. Unless you disagree that how a person treats other people is not a glimpse into them. But then you would just be flat out wrong.
I guess it gets back to my list my. Try not to get emotional. If ya thinks it wrong point out where. If it is emotional ask yourself why. I am done playing around now. Just the facts please. I am always willing to discuss my misunderstanding of the facts. I mean I don't know it all, but who does.
the list stands as a valid generalization. It makes accurate predictions on how people will respond to certain events around them. Good coaches, good teachers, and good leaders make use of similar understandings.
anti-logical Fallacies of Ambiguity