(April 10, 2015 at 5:14 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: It's a null and void question. The question is would you rather have it that you can't do good deeds and live in a perfect happy world. Or do you love being giving the chance to do good deeds.
If it's the latter, complaining about higher opportunities of good deeds, and better quality of goodness, doesn't seem rational.
I'm honestly confused. Are you seriously asking which of these following scenarios would be better?
a) Perfectly happy world. Like, no little kids die of cancer or starvation, no wars, no genocide, etc?
b) World as it is but I get "free will" to do nice things for people?
Come on, I like doing good deeds a lot. They need doing because the world is a shitty place sometimes. But I'd MUCH prefer the Perfectly happy world, if that were an option.
If YOU would prefer to keep your delusion of "free will" to do good deeds over saving the suffering, misery and death of millions and billions of innocent people, then you are sociopathic monster (just like all the Abrahamic gods are, so I guess no surprise there). Sorry.
BTW, this thread made me really internalize the truth and reality of Poe's Law. Jebus Christus! The loony is strong in this thread.
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?”
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
