(April 23, 2015 at 12:52 pm)Tonus Wrote:snowtracks Wrote:but of course, there isn’t any paleontology evidence (the claim of ‘future discovery’ only has a limited shelf-life {please not again, that is so lame}).This is awesome. You try to cover for your ignorance by making it seem as if you're trying to head off a "gaps" argument (which should set off anyone's hypocrite meter immediately) and it takes less than an hour for someone to produce the evidence you thought didn't exist. Too bad you didn't warn us against using 'past discovery.'
Not to mention that the whole reason he's so derisive of future discoveries is so that he can continue to make huge arguments from ignorance while avoiding the very obvious rebuttal that, just because we don't know something yet, doesn't make his unjustified assertions any more plausible.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!