Debunking of Modern Evolutionary and Cosmological Theories

[robvalue]

If the scientific community had to accept as true anything anyone ever submits, backed only by what is "evidence to them", then it would be an endless list of contradictory useless nonsense.

To establish what is actually true requires objective evidence. It requires demonstrating your findings by showing how others can reproduce them. If you can't do that, it doesn't matter what you think you know, it's of no use to anyone else I'm afraid, in a scientific sense. There must be a standard by which sound claims are differentiated from unsound ones, and this is the method.

If a scientific theory is actually wrong, anyone can disprove it. Have you considered the implications of your claims that science is corrupt? It would require nonstop patrolling of the Internet, and throughout the whole world, silencing anyone producing evidence which contradicts current theory before it got into the public domain. Do you think that is what is happening? Science has no need to silence people who have no case.

Since you asked, I have an A level in physics and chemistry, and a degree in maths. But I don't need any qualifications to be able to spot logical fallacies, and to point out the need for evidence to back claims.