(April 21, 2015 at 5:21 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: What I'm showing by this is the following:
1. These verses have an interpretation proven by either logic, flow of verses, or other parts of the Quran.
None of those are proof.
Quote:2. The true interpretation is the more clearer of the interpretations.
The true interpretation is the one you say it is? Gee, how convincing.
Quote:3. The false interpretation is assumed for some reason by majority of Muslims.
The false interpretation is the one you say it is? Gee, how convincing.
Quote:4. This cannot be rationally explained by natural reasons, there is a reason as to why they can't recite the verses with true interpretation when it's supported by logic or flow of verses or other parts of the Quran, and is also the clearer of the interpretations.
Natural reasons? What does that even mean?
Quote:5. The best explanation is that there a supernatural influence on the people to prevent them from seeing the family of Mohammad, the Imams of guidance, and their position in Quran.
That is most assuredly the least likely explanation. The most likely explanation is that people understand things in different ways and tend to believe what they're taught.
Quote:6. The dark forces being enemy to the family of Mohammad and the true recitation of Quran, is best explained if the family of Mohammad are true Guides and the dark force doesn't want the Muslims to recognize this.
What dark force? Seriously, dude, you need some actual evidence to back up your claims.
Quote:I think it's an argument that is rational.
But it's not. It is delusional.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.