(May 2, 2015 at 4:16 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(May 2, 2015 at 3:36 pm)Lek Wrote: Okay. You think I'm using bad reasoning. Do you believe that your wife, family or friends love you? If so, how do you determine whether they love you, or if they are just pretending to do so?
Why do you think that a tu coque fallacy presents a cogent response to what I said? Even if you're right and you manage to herd me down the garden path you're trying to set up, why do you think the fact that I believe something completely unrelated based on bad reasons in any way improves your reasons for believing in god?
By the way, even your completely irrelevant response is a bad example, as we can provide physical evidence of brain states consistent with the emotion of love. I don't need faith to believe that, and two wrongs do not make a right, for the eighty thousandth time.
What I'm trying to show is that you accept and believe in things that have the same type of evidence for going for them--based on experience.
