(January 23, 2009 at 12:19 pm)Eilonnwy Wrote: So chances are maybe YOUR specific view might be a little different, but in that case have you just definied God to some being that is free from considerations of the majorly accepted god model? If that's so, it's just your opinion, unprovable, untestable, and utterly worthless.
I understand what you are saying. I suspect that no 'model' can achieve what Stenger thinks might be achieved. We are applying things that may not apply to a supernatural being. Can we really define 'supernatural'? I don't think so......
"The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility"
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein