(September 12, 2010 at 3:58 pm)ThinkingMan Wrote: I'm still waiting for somebody to pick a hole in my logic from my original post.Didn't the overbearingly obvious fallacy of untestability ever occur to you once after typing in that inane pile of emotional incoherent drivel you tried to pass off as an argument for god?
In summary your position is simply this:-
Scientific process discovers the universe is larger than expected.
ThinkingMan asserts god is outside that and beyond investigation.
Scientific process unveils the universe is but one of many, a multiverse.
ThinkingMan asserts god is outside that too.
Scientific process realises the universe exists in but one dimension; there are microverses and macroverses much larger and smaller than our own.
ThinkingMan asserts god is outside those also.
And so on... and so on...
You keep moving the goalposts over and over, until you end up with a concept by which its definition is incomprehensible, it has no explanatory power, and cannot be repeated, falsified or demonstrated to anyone else to actually exist in reality, in fact you imply its' attributes as "unreal", so as far as science goes your god concept is utterly irrelevant, a fucking joke of a non-answer.
Now everyone's identified various flaws with your invalid logic, reasoning and cause-and-effect thinking, are you prepared to get off your soap box and address them?