There has been more news about Muhammadan pedophiles recently. This problem is widespread in England. It's so widespread that some selfish people might argue that adults having sexual relationships with children has once again become 'socially acceptable', as it was in Muhammad's time, and therefore people can start marrying children again (as Muhammad did). Clearly, Muhammad was influenced by moral relativism if the justification for his marriage to Aisha is "everyone else was doing it".
So it got me thinking. Catholic priests are not supposed to have sexual relations and Muhammadan men are supposed segregated from women. Are both of these groups, Catholic priests and Muhammadan men, sexually repressed? They are both denied the opposite gender and, although the justification may be different, the outcomes seem to be the same: They only way they feel that they can satisfy themselves is by taking advantage of minors.
Only certain Muhammadan groups employ strict gender segregation. And these Muhammadans are people that also claim that in certain circumstances (such as when a woman is not 'sufficiently covered up') rape is acceptable. Fortunately, Muhammadans are nowhere near Abdul Wahhab's Fascist (Salafi) views and it seems almost contradictory that in some Mosques women do pray alongside men (such as the one Yasmin Alibhai-Brown apparently attends[1]). It's reassuring to know that not all Mosques promote Fascism.
So anyway, we find Catholic priests and (presumably) Wahhabi men acting in similar ways. And I think it is because of the their shared sexual repression. Many Muhammadans are not allowed even to talk to the opposite gender (e.g. Saudi Arabia) until they are married and I think this both an unhealthy and unsustainable (thanks WWW) practice.
[1] Source YouTube video: UK Muslim society wants forced sex segregation in UK universities (10Dec13), 8:08 into the video.
So it got me thinking. Catholic priests are not supposed to have sexual relations and Muhammadan men are supposed segregated from women. Are both of these groups, Catholic priests and Muhammadan men, sexually repressed? They are both denied the opposite gender and, although the justification may be different, the outcomes seem to be the same: They only way they feel that they can satisfy themselves is by taking advantage of minors.
Only certain Muhammadan groups employ strict gender segregation. And these Muhammadans are people that also claim that in certain circumstances (such as when a woman is not 'sufficiently covered up') rape is acceptable. Fortunately, Muhammadans are nowhere near Abdul Wahhab's Fascist (Salafi) views and it seems almost contradictory that in some Mosques women do pray alongside men (such as the one Yasmin Alibhai-Brown apparently attends[1]). It's reassuring to know that not all Mosques promote Fascism.
So anyway, we find Catholic priests and (presumably) Wahhabi men acting in similar ways. And I think it is because of the their shared sexual repression. Many Muhammadans are not allowed even to talk to the opposite gender (e.g. Saudi Arabia) until they are married and I think this both an unhealthy and unsustainable (thanks WWW) practice.
[1] Source YouTube video: UK Muslim society wants forced sex segregation in UK universities (10Dec13), 8:08 into the video.
