(May 17, 2015 at 12:37 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:(May 17, 2015 at 12:28 pm)Stimbo Wrote: In fact, given how ubiquitous digital cameras are nowadays, it ought to be almost commonplace to have pictures of Jesus flying around the place.
If we did, would you believe them? No.
So, not having photos of Jesus is evidence that he does not exist, but having photos would not be evidence that he does exist.
Hmmm...it seems like you want to have it both ways.
And that sounds like a presupposition at work to me.
Nope evidence what so ever in Roman records, even if jesus existed pontious pilate would have written down something in a memo or something but no.
jesus never existed to begin with. There is no historical evidence whatsoever that Pilate ever administered the case of Jesus. The accounts were written into histories by the early church decades and centuries after the event was supposed to have happened. i don't wanna call you dumb but...you are easily fooled by your church and your religion wipe the bullshit out of eyes and actually question your book.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>