(May 16, 2015 at 4:11 am)robvalue Wrote: In what way am I against truth? The whole point of being a sceptic is I'm only interested in finding the truth by the best methods possible. I didn't say I don't care about the truth, I was saying that either outcome in this case has the same effect on me, nothing.
My misunderstanding. When you previously wrote: "I don't care if it's all true," I understood that to mean that you don't care what is true. In that case you would be opposing/suppressing truth. If you're saying that you don't care which statement/outcome is true, but that you care what is true, then you wouldn't be suppressing the truth.
(May 16, 2015 at 4:11 am)robvalue Wrote: If there was a way to investigate the truth of theistic claims, I'd be very interested in it. Usually there isn't, as they are unfalsifiable. I don't need to say the claims are wrong. Just that there's no good reason to think they are right.Is all knowledge gained by falsifiable means? Can empiricism account for the entirety of reality? If it cannot but you choose to use it as the sole basis by which to judge theistic arguments, you could be suppressing the truth.
If it could be proven beyond doubt that God exists...
and that He is the one spoken of in the Bible...
would you repent of your sins and place your faith in Jesus Christ?
