RE: [split] Big Announcement and Invitation
May 18, 2015 at 10:31 pm
(This post was last modified: May 18, 2015 at 10:43 pm by Randy Carson.)
(May 18, 2015 at 9:51 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:Quote:Dr. Thomas Plante, a psychologist at Santa Clara University, found that “80 to 90% of all priests who in fact abuse minors have sexually engaged with adolescent boys, not prepubescent children. Thus, the teenager is more at risk than the young altar boy or girls of any age."
This is homosexuality - not pedophilia - and the media does not want to report this fact.
Forgive me, my hair-splitter is at the shop for sharpening. The fact is, an adult assfucking a teenager is still a crime. That is not "homosexuality" -- that is homosexual priests molesting minors.
Yes, it is. But not one the media wants to talk about. Homosexuals are preying upon these kids...homosexual priests to be sure, but they are part of the homosexual community. And this doesn't fit well with the current love-affair that the media has with the LGBT agenda.
It happens in schools, it happens in Protestant Churches, it happens in Catholic Churches, it happened at Penn State, etc, etc. But the Catholic Church draws the heavy fire. Why do you suppose that is?
Quote:And that makes me wonder -- do you disagree with the Church's position that homosexuality is a sin, or, as your own Bible says, an "abomination"? Why do you defend sinners who not only commit "abomination", but do so upon minor children who both legally and sensibly cannot give informed consent -- and then pretend that it's not what it is?
Please cite the post # wherein I defended priests who have committed this or any crime. Are you actually following the thread at all?
Quote:You have a very, very detailed delineation of right and wrong. I wonder why it is that the line between right and wrong, in your mind, seems to depend on who is doing the wrong?
I'm thinking you've got a bunch of double-standards that cannot stand up to scrutiny. Therefore, I'm looking forward to your answer, because while my hair-splitter is in the shop, my scalpel is nice and oiled.
Explain yourself in a coherent fashion.
I did, and you have not understood. See my previous posts.
(May 18, 2015 at 10:19 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: No; you see, and I know this is probably very new information to you but bear with me -- even after Jesus was allegedly killed at Calvary, people still died.
People died of gunshot wounds and dysentery and the cancer that your god saw fit to create; they died of cliff-falls and shark attacks and pneumonia; they died in tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes and fires; and if none of that got them, and even if they were saved Christians, they still died of old age.
What this means for you, Skippy, is that your god is responsible for death. ALL death. After all, he invented it.
You are speaking here of physical death? Yes, death is a result of the fall. But your experience of life does not end when you stop breathing, Parker. Your spirit continues on living. FOREVER.
But you're pissed because people die? Even of old age? And that's God's fault because we don't live forever?
Quote:For you to complain that Stalin and Mao added up to a hundred million deaths, when your god's hands are so bloody is rich. You worship the original, and the most prolific, killer. And yet you complain that humans who haven't approached 1/20th of your god's toll are murderers because they lack belief in your god.
Sorry, but you look like a thoughtless twat when you shitpost like this. You really should examine what it is you believe, because clearly you worship an evil god, but are in denial about it.
How many people has the Catholic Church declared to be in hell, Parker? Ballpark number?
Quote:(May 18, 2015 at 10:19 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: This is poor logic, Parker. The faith did not PRODUCE the sin, the sin was there all along.
Nonsense. The fact is, they took advantage of a position of authority in order to satisfy their depravities, which the morality your god allegedly imbues did nothing to stop. If blind worshippers like you would open your eyes and stop assigning power to these perverts, their depredations would be much less -- yet you, in your faith, defend them.
It follows that their perversions are a product of your faith.
You're suggesting that Christianity teaches the rape of children as one of its formal doctrines?
Do you have any support for this position?