Another "I saw Jesus" claim

[Mudhammam]

All "J" words were created after 1633.  Therefore if you ever see a manuscript with a "J" word in it that was supposedly written before 1633 it's a fake.  "Jesus" didn't exist before 1633.  If Tacitus used any word with a "J" in it then the document is a fake.  

That's one hell of a strawman if I ever saw one. Obviously when people speak of older texts they don't expect the writer to have used modern English. Here's what the word "Jesus" would have looked like in other languages:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_%28name%29

---

@Kitan

I think Min gets ignored, not because of his radical position that often seems motivated by anti-Christian sentiment rather than sincere and rational analysis, but due to the fact that he kind of acts like a screaming, petulant child.