Present a BETTER worldview

[Welsh cake]

If you mean better as in "has the ability to explain the existence of the "fine-tuned" initial conditions and constants" then M-theory and the white-hole hypothesis are just as efficient, why? Becuase they both posit an infinite number of scenarios and this by definition allows an explanation for everything.

The point of this thread was for you to provide a BETTER explanation than God. These claims are just as extrodinary and lack just as much scientific evidence.

That's an unintelligible statement if ever I saw one, how does this theory within theoretical physics, an extension upon particle physics require as much evidence as an omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient deity? They cannot be compared, they both address separate issues, especially since your claim is as extraordinary as claims can feasibly get.

And, NO, it's not our damn responsibility to disprove your make-believe god, it's your burden of proof to demonstrate that he actually exists; shifting it to your audience will accomplish nothing. We were happily addressing the fine tuning argument and probability for the laws of physics prompting life to occur, that is, until you changed the topic matter completely.

Big Bang

This is a non answer. The BB only provides evidence that the universe had a begining which is consistent with what the bible says about creation ex nihilio.

You asked for a "better explanation" and I gave you a link to Big Bang model, which is not to be confused with a fictional villainous character from a book.

This is another failure. Abiogenesis is a failed hypothesis.

By your own omission your current understanding of abiogenesis and how scientific hypothesises work is the same as AngelThMan: little to none.

It's best to just do away with these "technical numbers" and just say its so UNLIKELY its impossible.

If that's your interpretation of the probability for life and/or non-life, still doesn't mean it can't happen, we're kind of the demonstrable evidence that it can indeed occur naturally, without a great big sky daddy.

Do you have a better explanation for:
1. DNA

Again, I can't address the other points because you're not making any sense. Can you possibly be anymore vague? What about DNA do you need a clearer explanation of? Its discovery? Properties? Structure? Evolution? RNA world hypothesis? What?