RE: Another "I saw Jesus" claim
May 20, 2015 at 1:38 am
(This post was last modified: May 20, 2015 at 1:38 am by Mudhammam.)
(May 20, 2015 at 12:39 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: As you now realize your island is rapidly shrinking. You have no name for the "John" characters. Consequently your ideas about them are totally skewed by your impression of what modern day Johns are like. When the writers gave the "Jesus" character the name of "Jesus" they gave him a completely new identity that the one the original con man gave him. So if someone claims to have seen"Jesus" they are saying that they saw a completely imaginary character. "Jesus" didn't exist 2,000 years ago. He's only about 400 years old.LOL. If you had read the posts at the top of this page, you'd have seen that I already gave an example of what Jesus' name would have been in the Greek: ησοῦς or Iēsous. John would have been ωάννης or Iōannēs. What "new identity" are you talking about? Are you saying nobody that we, using modern English, identity with a "J" in their name existed until 400 years ago? You can't be this fucking dumb... then again I'm not holding out much hope to the contrary.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
