(September 19, 2010 at 5:12 am)Rayaan Wrote: I think a super-natural being is something beyond the realm of scientific observation. And therefore, finding evidence of God is not a possible thing in the first place. That's why we can only depend on our reasoning, logic, and intuitive thinking to know the truth. So, that's the reason why I believe in a God even though I don't have any evidence for His existence.Where did I say "evidence" meant "scientific evidence"? Evidence is anything that can be used to show an assertion is true; whether that be physical observation, or rational argument. I have seen neither. If you claim that you have reasoning, logic, and intuitive thinking that proves God exists, I want to hear it.
(September 20, 2010 at 1:25 am)blood_pardon Wrote: I know there are contrary contentions to all the "God proofs" but if He actually does exist then the design, the cosmological, the moral, and the transcendental actually are valid arguments.No they wouldn't. Arguments are only valid if the premises support the conclusion in a logical way. None of the arguments you cited for God existing are logically valid, as they all commit logical fallacies at some point. Just because the conclusion of the argument is true, doesn't mean the rest of the argument is valid.