Another "I saw Jesus" claim

[Wyrd of Gawd]

As I've pointed out several times none of your links actually show anything in detail.  They are just assertions that the documents were written as claimed.  If the documents are legit why can't you provide links that show all of their pages in fine detail?  

An English committee wrote the Codex Amiatinus as a gift to Pope Gregory II but he croaked before he got his copy.  The Bible as a complete book didn't exist before then.  

The modern Bible format wasn't completed until around 1550 with the verbiage being broken down into numbered verses.  The idea about putting the fairy tale into chapters had been introduced around the 1220s.  

I'm looking forward to your links that will show some fine details of your original Bibles.  
  

Once again dolt, http://atheistforums.org/thread-32354-page-5.html contains such a link... in fact, the very first one, to the Codex Sinaiticus

Usually when a tab says "See the manuscript," it means you can look at the "fine details" ...of a very ancient copy... not an "original" Bible. Gawd you fundamentalists are dumb.

I'm apologizing to myself for wasting my time trying to explain simple facts (which your friends at Google can assist further) to a brain dead religious nut so don't expect any more replies until you provide something substantial that corresponds to either points 1-4.

Oh, you mean those illegible scraps of something, probably soaked in acid, is supposed to be the real deal?  
http://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript...omSlider=0

I have to say that a person has to be really gullible to believe that "evidence".