RE: Hello, Anyone interested in a debate?
May 28, 2015 at 10:43 am
(This post was last modified: May 28, 2015 at 10:46 am by comet.)
anima, your debate has many levels and rows. We can "brake" our answers down to "logic", "emotional needs", and philosophical to put a stop to piles of bullshit.
Philosophical means we are allowed to make up any bs we want. Whatever we start with (the if's) leads us down the a path that is only as valid as the starting "if's". and even whatever knows the amount of bullshit we can self justify with is unlimited.
"Emotional". there are a lot of people emotionally attached to "no-nothing", "anti-whatever", and "Omni dude". Until we dig down and find the cause of the emotional attachment to the belief we can't really understand it. And most people won't tell us the initial event that caused the "hatred" in them. And I haven't seen "deep hate" not associated with personal events or mental illness. Most times people convolute their feelings into reality for all. An example of this is people's takes on "unions" or 'ceo's". Logically its simple, emotionally it a hole nuttier ball of wax.
"logically": this involve some formal training and an understanding of one's self. It really is for people that don't care as long as we find out what is going on. That eliminates most, not all, but most of the people. Call it "60% most" if-en ya need to think we immune.
And Don't bite into the "if you don't believe one thing stated in a stance that the whole stance is wrong. I don't agree with all the stupid rules in the usa. I am still an American. This atheist site is a cesspool of anti-theist. so any objective analysis is utterly ignored if it even hints that theist may have a point. Although I must admit, I see some rational atheist showing up, that's nice.
Philosophical means we are allowed to make up any bs we want. Whatever we start with (the if's) leads us down the a path that is only as valid as the starting "if's". and even whatever knows the amount of bullshit we can self justify with is unlimited.
"Emotional". there are a lot of people emotionally attached to "no-nothing", "anti-whatever", and "Omni dude". Until we dig down and find the cause of the emotional attachment to the belief we can't really understand it. And most people won't tell us the initial event that caused the "hatred" in them. And I haven't seen "deep hate" not associated with personal events or mental illness. Most times people convolute their feelings into reality for all. An example of this is people's takes on "unions" or 'ceo's". Logically its simple, emotionally it a hole nuttier ball of wax.
"logically": this involve some formal training and an understanding of one's self. It really is for people that don't care as long as we find out what is going on. That eliminates most, not all, but most of the people. Call it "60% most" if-en ya need to think we immune.
And Don't bite into the "if you don't believe one thing stated in a stance that the whole stance is wrong. I don't agree with all the stupid rules in the usa. I am still an American. This atheist site is a cesspool of anti-theist. so any objective analysis is utterly ignored if it even hints that theist may have a point. Although I must admit, I see some rational atheist showing up, that's nice.
anti-logical Fallacies of Ambiguity