RE: Do Humans Have Compulsary Will? Which best describes your take on 'will'?
May 29, 2015 at 7:04 pm
(This post was last modified: May 29, 2015 at 7:05 pm by bennyboy.)
(May 29, 2015 at 6:38 pm)Rhythm Wrote:No. You haven't even given me flowers!Quote:I think, philosophically, the question of mind is why there are minds rather than not, given that they pose no additional utility to any physical system, in terms of physical input and output.b-mine
Quote:Then I think...philosophically, you should begin by scrutinizing your assumptions. Lest you go down the rabbit hole from the very outset, as before. My mind appears to be granting me additional utility...yours doesn't?Not in terms of physical input and output, no, unless you define mind in terms of data processing. But that would beg the question.
(May 29, 2015 at 7:03 pm)Rhythm Wrote: No Benny, we don't have to abandon anything - even if that were true-.
If you think that mind and the structures/functions on which it supervenes have temporal lag, then they are not the same thing, and mind is now a separate entity, floating in space. I don't think this accords well with a physicalist view of mind.