RE: Bill O'Reilly punks Richard Dawkins
September 25, 2010 at 4:32 pm
(This post was last modified: September 25, 2010 at 4:33 pm by Ace Otana.)
(September 25, 2010 at 3:20 pm)A Theist Wrote: Bill O'Reilly debates Richard Dawkins and wins. What do you think?
Dawkins won that argument, for his points still stand.
Just because we don't have all the answers doesn't mean you do with god.
No one knows how everything came about, even theists. Dawkins made excellant points and O'Reilly just ignored them. Plus, O'Reilly started yelling. Not a good thing when your trying to defend your argument.
Dawkins answered and with great points. O'Reilly lost the argument the moment he started yelling.
That's all I have to say. O'Reilly is a prat.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
